It looks like the Clinton Foundation Controversy machine is running through the media again, and this time, with full force and new bombshells.
However, the Mainstream Media is taking this news without even reporting on it. These new bombshells and revelations are falling on deaf ears, and being forever forgotten.
It raises the questions. Will them media ever listen to the true news topics that arise from the Foundation? Is there a nuclear bomb-like revelation hiding deep within the foundation?
It is time for me to Educate you again on what exactly has happened with the foundation within the past few days and weeks. I’ve gone over the Foundation and it’s ties to the major billionaires, companies and pundits in the past, and it is time to bring these new revelations, that have been previously forgotten by the MSM, to you.
Get ready to take notes and listen closely, cause there is a lot to learn and a lot to see.
1) State Department Connection and “Pay to Play”
Let’s start off with a big and juicy topic about the Clinton Foundation.
According to The Daily Caller:
Newly released State Department emails appear to show that a top Clinton Foundation official asked Hillary Clinton’s State Department aides for favors for two individuals — controversial multi-million dollar Clinton Foundation donor and for an unnamed associate.
The April 2009 exchanges, which the State Department provided to the watchdog group Judicial Watch, will likely raise more questions about conflicts of interest between the former secretary of state and her family charity.
In one exchange, Doug Band, the former “body man” to Bill Clinton, forwarded an email from an associate to Hillary Clinton aides Huma Abedin, Nora Toiv, and Cheryl Mills.
The unidentified individual had sent an email to Band with the subject line: “A favor.”
Here’s the 1st Email:
The Heavily redacted email discusses “A Favor” Between top CF advisor, Doug Band, and Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills at the state department.
The Favor is not revealed in this email, as it has been redacted, but it seems to talk about a person of interest to get money off of or secure a job.
It may have been a Donor or a very important person to the Clintons.
The New York Post also writes about another email:
In an April 2009 message to Abedin and Mills, Doug Band, who was overseeing the Clinton Foundation at the time, urgently asked for a meeting between a top US official and Gilbert Chagoury — a major donor to the Clinton family charity.
“We need to speak to the substance person re Lebanon. As you know, he’s [Chagoury] key guy there and to us and is loved in lebanon,” wrote Band, in a clear attempt to suck up to a big donor to the foundation…
…Chagoury is a Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire who gave the Clinton Foundation between $1 million and $5 million. In 2009, he also pledged $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative.
The construction magnate, a close pal of Bill Clinton’s, has financial interests around the world. He was convicted in Switzerland in 2000 of money laundering and paid a $66 million fine in a plea deal.
This “Pay to Play” scheme seems to be a money laundering operation, as major individuals who are wealthy and very powerful in their respective countries and industries are being targeted and bribed with special access and promotions for their donations. The Clinton foundation is a piggy bank for Clinton and a pay to win scheme as well as a pay to play.
The new batch of emails, From Judicial watch, Show many more of these “Pay to Play” schemes taking place with other associates in the international community.
Some of these people include, according to the Washington Examiner:
Wall Street executive
Hillary Clinton welcomed a Feb. 2009 meeting with Stephen Roach, a top executive at Morgan Stanley, after Roach slipped her a copy of the testimony he planned to deliver before Congress the following week.
The Democratic nominee instructed her staff to arrange a time to meet Roach, who then ran the bank’s Asian operations, in Beijing during her upcoming swing through southeast Asia.
Morgan Stanley has given up to $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation, donor records show. Roach had personally donated heavily to Clinton’s past political campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
The testimony Roach delivered encouraged U.S. officials to dial back the tough talk on China and embrace trade deals that included Beijing’s interests. The Morgan Stanley executive chastised politicians for saddling Wall Street with the blame for economic failures and encouraged the U.S. to address a receding middle class “without derailing globalization.”
Roach’s Company had already given Clinton $800,000+ to the Clinton campaigns, as well as Hundreds of thousands of dollars in speaking fees. Note some of the other banks on there, such as Citigroup and JP Morgan.
In Return, Clinton Spoke at various bank sponsored events, give Top level CEOs access to the State Department and much more.
In this case, Clinton was willing to help push a trade deal with china between Roach and the Pacific nations in order to benefit the banks that had donated to her campaign or foundation.
Hillary Clinton asked Abedin in April 2009 whether she should reach out to a Pentagon official on behalf of Jackie Newmyer, a longtime friend and president of a consulting firm called Long Term Strategy Group.
Emails made public by the State Department suggest Newmyer secured meetings with Department of Defense officials by the following month about landing a contract for her firm.
In March, Newmyer had prepared for Hillary Clinton a proposal in the hopes of winning a consulting deal with the State Department.
Newmyer aimed to advise the administration on Iran, among other things, as the U.S. moved toward its controversial negotiations with the country.
2) Cheryl Mills
You may not know this, but Prior to, and after Hillary’s tenure as Secretary of State, the beloved aide to Clinton was actually on the Board of Directors for the Clinton Foundation!
Don’t believe me? Here is the evidence ripped directly from the Clinton foundation Board of Directors webpage.
A report from CNN and LawNewz describes the link between The State Dept and the Clinton Foundation, even though Clinton had Pledged NOT to support her own charity while secretary:
“On June 19, 2012, Mills, then the chief of staff for Clinton at the State Department, boarded a New York City-bound Amtrak train in Washington’s Union station, investigative reporter Drew Griffin told Jake Tapper on The Lead. “The next morning, at the offices of a New York based executive search firm, Mills would interview two high-level business executives. Her mission was to help the Clinton Foundation find a new leader, a source told CNN.”
Mills alleged direct involvement in the operation of the Clinton Foundation while simultaneously serving as Clinton’s chief of staff at the State Department is the latest example of the questionable relationship between the State Department and the foundation.
As the report further explains, “The top-level executives Mills would interview for the big job at the Clinton Foundation worked at Pfizer and WalMart — companies that have been huge donors to Foundation, and partners with the Clinton Global Initiative.”
The network reached out to the State Department to ask if they were even aware of the trip. A spokesperson replied, although somewhat avoided answering the question:
“Federal employees are permitted to engage in outside personal activities, within the scope of the federal ethics rules. All federal employees are subject to federal ethics laws and regulations, including rules pertaining to conflicts of interest.”
Mills’ attorney also reportedly told the network there was nothing untoward about her involvement with the Clinton Foundation during her time at the State Department. The attorney said all of the work was done on a strictly voluntary basis.
Similarly, a Clinton campaign spokesman also denied that there was anything inappropriate about Mills’ involvement with the foundation.
“Cheryl volunteered her personal time to a charitable organization, as she has to other charities,” Brian Fallon said. “Cheryl paid for her travel to New York City personally, and it was crystal clear to all involved that this had nothing to do with her official duties. The idea that this poses a conflict of interest is absurd.”
s:http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/cheryl-mills-helped-clinton-foundation-while-serving-as-state-dept-chief-of-staff/ and http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/11/politics/hillary-clinton-cgi-cheryl-mills/index.html
Cheryl Mills had close ties to the Clinton Foundation even during her tenure as aide to the Secretary at the time, Hillary Clinton.
In past Blog posts, I have documented about certain donors and staffers who got perks and were tied to the foundation who became involved with the State Department.
The Purpose of the NY trip was never fully disclosed, but it was likely to find new interest to add to the Clinton Foundation, as well as key people who could wire money into the foundation through banks and large sums of donations from wealthy people.
3) Tax Return Controversy
Here are some images you need to see from Clinton’s latest Tax return Release:
Gems Education is a big one, We will get to that in a little bit.
Breitbart Reports about these Taxes:
Clinton has tried to paint Trump has an out-of-touch business mogul but her substantial wealth has caused headaches. Republicans have seized upon the millions in speaking fees and a tone-deaf comment by Clinton in a 2014 interview that she was “dead broke” after leaving the White House in 2001. The couple owed millions in legal fees, but quickly generated far more from book deals, paid appearances and consulting fees.
In total, the Clintons earned than $139 million between 2007 and 2014, according to eight years of federal income tax returns released by her campaign last July.
The bulk of their income came from speeches delivered to corporate and interest groups, which paid Bill Clinton and later Hillary Clinton after she resigned as secretary of state in early 2013.
Bill Clinton’s consulting work for GEMS Education, a global network of for-profit schools based in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, earned him more than $5.6 million in fees between 2010 and 2015, according to the Clinton tax returns.
Bill Clinton also earned more than $17 million over the same period for consulting work for Laureate Education, Inc., another worldwide for-profit education system based in Baltimore that has come under controversy.
Bill Clinton’s office last year said he had ended his consulting relationship with Laureate, but no similar statement has been made regarding to GEMS, which stands for Global Education Management Systems. His office did not immediately respond to a question about whether he still has a relationship with GEMS.
Also, here are the Speaking fees earned by the Clinton’s in 2013 ALONE.
There are many Banks, Massive corporations who have given to the Foundations, such as Cisco, and other companies who have backed Clinton.
According to CNNMoney, 60% of their income is from speeches and other events. And most of this money comes from companies or individuals who have already given to the Foundation!
Now, about GEMS education, The daily Caller reports:
Former President Bill Clinton collected $5.6 million in fees from GEMS Education, a Dubai-based company that teaches Sharia Law through its network of more than 100 schools in the Middle East, Asia and Africa, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.
The company’s finances strictly adhere to “Sharia Finance,” which includes giving “zakat,” a religious tax of which one-eighth of the proceeds is dedicated to funding Islamic jihad.
The company also contributed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.
His biggest paycheck from the closely-held company — which is incorporated in the Cayman Islands — was in 2014 when he pocketed $2.1 million. It is unclear if Bill received income from the Middle Eastern firm in 2015, since Hillary has not yet released her tax return for that year…
…GEMS boasted in a 2013 bond prospectus that it is the “only foreign group approved for educational services in Saudi Arabia.” The GEMS facilities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, taught 1,600 students in 2013.
Saudi Arabia is where Wahabism, the strictest form of Sharia, is observed. The Middle Eastern kingdom bars women from driving cars, requires women to wear the strictest form of the hijab, which covers everything but the eyes and hands. Gay men and women are persecuted in Saudi Arabia.
GEMS distributed a job notice in 2014 for a director of “Islamic and Cultural Studies” for its campuses in the Saudi Kingdom. The skills for the position included proficiency in Sharia to help develop a curriculum. The company also acts as an educational consultant in Egypt, Jordan, and Libya…
That’s strange, If Clinton was against ISIS and the teachings of Sharia Law, why are they funding education that is Pro-Sharia?
GEMS has several locations worldwide that teach the law of Sharia, including operations run here in the United States and our neighbors in the United Kingdom.
This has inevitably lead to the rise in recent attacks of jihad such as in Orlando and San Bernardino.
Also in the article:
The Dubai firm has donated between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to the foundation website. GEMS was an official sponsor of the 2013 and 2014 Clinton Global Initiative. Its Indian-born CEO Sunny Varkey attended both years.
And the Varkey Foundation, named after the CEO, contributed $250,000 to $500,000 to the foundation.
Varkey publicly claimed Bill was the “honorary chairman” of his foundation. But Bill and Hillary report in their joint federal tax returns the annual payments came from the for-profit GEMS Education company.
The company has raised funds through bonds and has openly broadcast its commitment to Sharia finance. In 2013, the company issued a $200 million bond prospectus and assured potential investors it relied on “Fatwa and Sharia” advisers to assure it was “compliant” with Sharia finance.
Coughlin said Sharia law on finance also includes money for “zakat,” a religious tax. “And if you read the law of zakat, one-eighth of that money goes to fund Jihad,” he says. “There are eight categories of zakat you must pay every year. And one of them is Jihad.”
Two of the banks — Emirates NB and Noor Bank — provided critical loans to GEMS in August, 2015, and were also accused of conducting illicit banking deals with Iran.
Why are they receiving Money and Giving money to a pro-sharia group that promotes jihad in the international community?
There’s a lot more on this subject, the GEMS connection and may other Clinton scandals and news…